Every score ships with its reasoning attached. Each lead lands as a full dossier: who they are, the evidence behind the ranking, and the recommended next step, delivered in under 90 seconds.
A 0-100 score, banded into three tiers. Conservative by design: A-tier means the available evidence supports immediate human follow-up, and the model is calibrated to under-rank uncertain evidence rather than manufacture confidence.
Strong corroborated evidence of intent and self-reported financial range. Triggers an immediate text to the principals with the dossier and a call brief.
Real interest, thinner evidence. Worth a structured follow-up rather than a same-day call.
Little corroboration or low intent. Filed, tracked according to your retention policy, and re-scored when new evidence arrives.
Identity and role signals, self-reported accreditation and financial-range signals, stated intent, and source activity combine into the 0-100 score. Every dossier shows the reasoning, so the score is inspectable rather than oracular.
When the engine cannot corroborate, the score goes down and the confidence label says so. Missing data is never filled with optimistic assumptions.
A sparse public profile should not quietly bury a legitimate investor. When intent is strong but corroboration is limited, Gold Sifter surfaces the uncertainty for review instead of quietly downgrading.
Accreditation and financial-range figures derived from the lead's own answers carry that label everywhere they appear, and are never presented as determinations. The determination stays with you and your counsel.
During setup and the pilot, the scoring is calibrated to your offering: what qualifies, which signals matter, and how tiers map to your team's call priorities.